The news 'Egyptian newspaper under fire over altered photo' reported by BBC on 15th December 2010 brings an issue of ethics in photojournalism. The alteration of the photo has made the Egypt's state-run newspaper come under fire. According to The Nation Press Photographers Association, the photographs that are callously intrusive or are manipulated can cause a serious harm, thus, photographs that have been edited should maintain the integrity of the images' content and context to avoid misleading or misrepresenting (2011).
The original photo that was taken on 1st of September from White House shows that President Barack Obama leading the international politicians. (Source: BBC, 2011) |
The altered photo with President Mubarak leading (Source: BBC, 2011) |
This case that happened in Egypt was not the first case, there was a case reported on BBC stated 'Reuters drops Beirut photographer' on 8th August, 2006. The news reported the Reuters fired a freelance photographer who has withdrawn from sale 920 of his pictures because of doctoring two images that was taken in Lebanon.
A doctored images of an Israeli air striking by Adnan Hajj. (Source: BBC, 2006) |
In my opinion, photographs in journalism must present accurately and trustworthy to the readers. Before publishing, the editors must take into consideration whether the photograph can bring negative effects to the readers e.g. offending the readers, invasion of privacy etc. On the other hand, the issue that whether the photographs bring any benefit to the readers must also be considered.
reference list
Bersak D. R, 2006, Ethics in Photojournalism: Past, Present, and Future, p. 2-71,
http://web.mit.edu/drb/Public/PhotoThesis/
Walsh, M. 2006, “‘Textual shift’: Examining the reading process with print, visual and multimodal texts,” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, vol.29, no.1, p.24-37
No comments:
Post a Comment